Antarctic upper mantle rheology

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

E. R. Ivins (California Institute of Technology)

W. van der Wal (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

D. A. Wiens (Washington University in St. Louis)

A. J. Lloyd (Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory)

L. Caron (University of California, California Institute of Technology)

Research Group
Astrodynamics & Space Missions
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1144/M56-2020-19 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Research Group
Astrodynamics & Space Missions
Issue number
1
Volume number
56
Pages (from-to)
267-294
Downloads counter
290
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The Antarctic mantle and lithosphere are known to have large lateral contrasts in seismic velocity and tectonic history. These contrasts suggest differences in the response timescale of mantle flow across the continent, similar to those documented between the northeastern and southwestern upper mantle of North America. Glacial isostatic adjustment and geodynamical modelling rely on independent estimates of lateral variability in effective viscosity. Recent improvements in imaging techniques and the distribution of seismic stations now allow reso-lution of both lateral and vertical variability of seismic velocity, making detailed inferences about lateral viscosity variations possible. Geodetic and palaeosea-level investigations of Antarctica provide quantitative ways of independently assessing the 3D mantle viscosity structure. While observational and causal connections between inferred lateral viscosity variability and seismic velocity changes are qualitatively reconciled, significant improvements in the quantitative relations between effective viscosity anomalies and those imaged by P-and S-wave tomography have remained elusive. Here we describe several methods for estimating effective viscosity from S-wave velocity. We then present and com-pare maps of the viscosity variability beneath Antarctica based on the recent S-wave velocity model ANT-20 using three different approaches.