Mass and heat integration in ethanol production mills for enhanced process efficiency and exergy-based renewability performance

Journal Article (2019)
Authors

Pablo Silva Ortiz (University of Campinas, TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Rubens Maciel Filho (University of Campinas)

J.A. Posada Duque (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Research Group
BT/Biotechnology and Society
Copyright
© 2019 P. Silva Ortiz, Rubens Maciel Filho, J.A. Posada Duque
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7100670
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 P. Silva Ortiz, Rubens Maciel Filho, J.A. Posada Duque
Research Group
BT/Biotechnology and Society
Issue number
10
Volume number
7
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7100670
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper presents the process design and assessment of a sugarcane-based ethanol production system that combines the usage of both mass and heat integration (pinch analysis) strategies to enhance the process efficiency and renewability performance. Three configurations were analyzed: (i) Base case: traditional ethanol production (1G); (ii) mass-integrated (1G2G); and (iii) mass and heat-integrated system (1G2G-HI). The overall assessment of these systems was based on complementary approaches such as mass and mass-heat integration, energy and exergy analysis, exergy-based greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and renewability exergy criteria. The performances of the three cases were assessed through five key performance indicators (KIPs) divided into two groups: one is related to process performance, namely, energy efficiency, exergy efficiency, and average unitary exergy cost (AUEC), and the other one is associated to environmental performance i.e., exergy-based CO2-equation emissions and renewability exergy index. Results showed a higher exergy efficiency of 50% and the lowest AUEC of all the systems (1.61 kJ/kJ) for 1G2G-HI. Furthermore, the destroyed exergy in 1G2G-HI was lower by 7% and 9% in comparison to the 1G and 1G2G cases, respectively. Regarding the exergy-based GHG emissions and renewability performance (λindex), the 1G2G-HI case presented the lowest impacts in terms of the CO2-equivalent emissions (94.10 gCO2-eq/MJ products), while λindex was found to be environmentally unfavorable (λ = 0.77). However, λindex became favorable (λ > 1) when the useful exergy of the byproducts was considered.

Files

Processes_07_00670_v2.pdf
(pdf | 4.4 Mb)
License info not available