Mass and heat integration in ethanol production mills for enhanced process efficiency and exergy-based renewability performance

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

P. Silva Ortiz (University of Campinas, TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Rubens Maciel Filhob (University of Campinas)

J. A. Posada Duque (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Research Group
BT/Biotechnology and Society
Copyright
© 2019 P. Silva Ortiz, Rubens Maciel Filho, J.A. Posada Duque
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7100670
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 P. Silva Ortiz, Rubens Maciel Filho, J.A. Posada Duque
Research Group
BT/Biotechnology and Society
Issue number
10
Volume number
7
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper presents the process design and assessment of a sugarcane-based ethanol production system that combines the usage of both mass and heat integration (pinch analysis) strategies to enhance the process efficiency and renewability performance. Three configurations were analyzed: (i) Base case: traditional ethanol production (1G); (ii) mass-integrated (1G2G); and (iii) mass and heat-integrated system (1G2G-HI). The overall assessment of these systems was based on complementary approaches such as mass and mass-heat integration, energy and exergy analysis, exergy-based greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and renewability exergy criteria. The performances of the three cases were assessed through five key performance indicators (KIPs) divided into two groups: one is related to process performance, namely, energy efficiency, exergy efficiency, and average unitary exergy cost (AUEC), and the other one is associated to environmental performance i.e., exergy-based CO2-equation emissions and renewability exergy index. Results showed a higher exergy efficiency of 50% and the lowest AUEC of all the systems (1.61 kJ/kJ) for 1G2G-HI. Furthermore, the destroyed exergy in 1G2G-HI was lower by 7% and 9% in comparison to the 1G and 1G2G cases, respectively. Regarding the exergy-based GHG emissions and renewability performance (λindex), the 1G2G-HI case presented the lowest impacts in terms of the CO2-equivalent emissions (94.10 gCO2-eq/MJ products), while λindex was found to be environmentally unfavorable (λ = 0.77). However, λindex became favorable (λ > 1) when the useful exergy of the byproducts was considered.

Files

Processes_07_00670_v2.pdf
(pdf | 4.4 Mb)
License info not available