Uptake Kinetics of CrAssphage, PMMoV, Human Adenovirus 40/41, Norovirus GII, Enterovirus, and SARS-CoV-2 on Electronegative Membrane Passive Samplers

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Adnan Ege Sener (TU Delft - Water Systems Engineering, KWR Water Research Institute)

Leo Heijnen (KWR Water Research Institute)

Miranda de Graaf (Erasmus MC)

Jeroen Langeveld (TU Delft - Water Systems Engineering, Partners4UrbanWater)

Gertjan Medema (KWR Water Research Institute, TU Delft - Water Systems Engineering)

Research Group
Water Systems Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00976
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Water Systems Engineering
Issue number
2
Volume number
6
Pages (from-to)
903-912
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Wastewater surveillance (WWS) of viruses can aid public health officials in monitoring community infection dynamics and act as an early warning system for the introduction of viral infectious diseases. In recent years, agile, low-cost devices called passive samplers have proven to be indispensable for targeted wastewater surveillance. However, the viral uptake kinetics are unexplored for most viruses, limiting the understanding of optimal deployment times and the representativeness of this sampling method for assessing community viral shedding. This study investigates the uptake kinetics of CrAssphage, Pepper Mild Mottle Virus, Human Adenovirus 40/41, Human Norovirus genogroup II, Enterovirus, and SARS-CoV-2 on electronegative membrane passive samplers. Viral uptake was modeled by linear and pseudo-first-order uptake models for up to 48 h (adjusted R2: 0.89–0.99), with minimal saturation for 48 h. Bench-scale experiments revealed enrichment of Human Adenoviruses 40/41 on membranes compared to all other viral targets for 24–48 h deployment (p < 0.05), while differences were less pronounced with shorter deployment durations. This work highlights virus-specific interactions with passive samplers and how deployment times can affect the relative concentrations of viruses detected. Understanding these kinetics is critical for selecting appropriate sampling strategies and normalization methodologies for WWS of viral infectious diseases.

Files

Taverne
warning

File under embargo until 23-07-2026