Process intensification of multi-stage heat pump assisted distillation with liquid injection

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Chengtian Cui (TU Delft - Applied Sciences, Åbo Akademi University)

Anton A. Kiss (TU Delft - Applied Sciences)

Research Group
ChemE/Process Systems Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2026.110796 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
ChemE/Process Systems Engineering
Journal title
Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
Volume number
224
Article number
110796
Downloads counter
11
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Multi-stage mechanical vapor recompression (MVR) is a promising route to electrify and intensify distillation for wide-boiling separations, yet its deployment is often constrained by the requirements for effective inter-stage cooling and utilization of the associated sensible heat. This work proposes and evaluates liquid injection as a compact intensification alternative to conventional exchanger-based intercooling in a two-stage MVR system. Unlike prior work on the discretely heat integrated distillation column (D-HIDiC), this study introduces liquid injection directly into MVR systems, eliminating intercooler hardware while maintaining energy performance. Four configurations are examined: a two-stage MVR without intercooling (MVR #1), an intercooled MVR with internal heat recovery to an additional bottom reboiler (MVR #2), a liquid injection MVR without an intercooler (MVR #3), and a liquid injection MVR combined with pre-compressor splitting (MVR #4) to mitigate the increased second-stage compressor load caused by injection. Compared with conventional distillation (CDiC, 10,073 kW reboiler duty), all MVR cases reduce the final energy input to 1759–1850 kW (81.6–82.5% savings) with COP values of 5.445–5.727; MVR #4 achieves the lowest compressor power (1759 kW) and the highest COP (5.727). On a primary-energy basis (36.6% electricity conversion efficiency), the MVR schemes deliver 49.8–52.3% savings versus CDiC. Overall, liquid injection enables equipment simplification with competitive efficiency, while pre-compressor splitting provides a practical tuning degree of freedom to recover or improve performance without sacrificing compactness.