From Anatomy to Innovation

Embedding Patient-Centered Design in Medical Education

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Louis John Koizia (Imperial College London)

Pieter Vandekerckhove (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Steven Howard (University of Alabama at Birmingham)

Bettina Maisch (Munich University of Applied Sciences)

Benjamin Howell Lole Harris (Imperial College London, University of Oxford)

Department
Delft Centre for Entrepreneurship
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2196/86230 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Department
Delft Centre for Entrepreneurship
Journal title
JMIR Medical Education
Volume number
12
Article number
e86230
Downloads counter
8
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Medical education has traditionally focused on mastering biomedical knowledge, clinical skills, and professionalism. Yet it remains poorly equipped to prepare doctors for the complex, rapidly changing health systems they will work in. Despite repeated calls for transformative learning, progress in teaching system innovation has been limited. Current curricula produce clinicians adept at treating disease but often underprepared to address system failures or contribute to organizational change. Embedding patient-centered innovation within training may help address this gap. This approach integrates design thinking, value-based health care, and co-design with patients to cultivate the metacompetence required to engage with system change. Emerging examples suggest that innovation education is most effective when integrated within existing activities such as quality improvement initiatives, multidisciplinary collaboration, and protected time for improvement work. Teaching these principles early may help normalize innovation as an integral component of clinical practice rather than a peripheral activity. Lessons from the successful integration of communication skills and ethics into medical curricula demonstrate that such cultural shifts are possible. Practical approaches may include incorporating design-thinking exercises, patient co-creation activities, and innovation projects alongside existing quality improvement and leadership programs. Reframing innovation as part of professional responsibility may empower clinicians to act as catalysts for system improvement. From anatomy to innovation, medical education must continue to evolve, preparing doctors not only to treat patients but also to engage with the systems that shape health care delivery.

Files

Mededu-2026-1-e86230.pdf
(pdf | 0.305 Mb)
License info not available