Inarticulate Experiences in Qualitative Health Research

Bounds and Bounty of Expression Types

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Paul Lindhout (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Truus Teunissen (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Merel Visse (University of Humanistic Studies, Drew University)

Safety and Security Science
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920978107
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Safety and Security Science
Volume number
19
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Not all human experiences can be expressed in words. Arts-based expressions may be useful to qualitative researchers as they can disclose people’s experiences with health, illness and disability. These expressions, which connect with non-linguistic and unexplored realms of experience, may support researchers’ efforts to honor the complexities of their lives. In our study, we explored and identified modes of expression among those sharing their experiences in health care and wellbeing research and practice. We present an inventory of human expression types based on a hierarchical classification and a literature review. The expression types which involve modes of both verbal and non-verbal knowing, show a bounty of possible ways for researchers and others to extend their study designs beyond verbalized accounts. We contend that using non-verbal expression types can assist qualitative researchers in fostering the articulation of complex experiences. As drawing upon a variety of methods in the inventory of expression types comes with new methodological bounds, researchers need to explicate their paradigmatic point of departure. It is expected that researchers, other professionals, and the general public will increase their holistic understandings of a subject’s experience by being open to a variety of expression types during data collection, interpretation, and presentation.