Against epistemic transparency of algorithms

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Juan M. Durán (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2026.10246 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Journal title
Philosophy of Science
Page Views
54
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Epistemic transparency is often proposed as a solution to algorithmic opacity, wherein revealing the inner logic of an algorithm provides reasons or supporting evidence for the justification of its outputs. I argue that transparency is defective in belief formation and thus inadequate as an epistemology of algorithms. Two objections are developed: transparency regress and bootstrapping, both rooted in transparency’s status as a time-sliced, ‘outsourced’ inferentialist epistemology. While weaker forms—such as contextual transparency—are briefly considered, the central argument remains that transparency fails to provide justification and should be abandoned as an epistemology of algorithms.