Synthetic CT generation using Zero TE MR for head-and-neck radiotherapy
Iris Lauwers (Erasmus MC)
Marta Capala (Erasmus MC)
Sandeep Kaushik (Universitat Zurich, GE HealthCare, Germany)
László Ruskó (GE Healthcare Magyarorszag, Hungary)
Jean Paul Kleijnen (Haaglanden Medical Center)
Jonathan Wyatt (Newcastle University)
Hazel McCallum (Newcastle University)
Gerda M. Verduijn (Erasmus MC)
J.A. Hernandez-Tamames (TU Delft - ImPhys/Vos group, Erasmus MC)
More Authors (External organisation)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: MRI-based synthetic CTs (synCTs) show promise to replace planning CT scans in various anatomical regions. However, the head-and-neck region remains challenging because of patient-specific air, bone and soft tissues interfaces and oropharynx cavities. Zero-Echo-Time (ZTE) MRI can be fast and silent, accurately discriminate bone and air, and could potentially lead to high dose calculation accuracy, but is relatively unexplored for the head-and-neck region. Here, we prospectively evaluated the dosimetric accuracy of a novel, fast ZTE sequence for synCT generation. Materials and Methods: The method was developed based on 127 patients and validated in an independent test (n = 17). synCTs were generated using a multi-task 2D U-net from ZTE MRIs (scanning time: 2:33 min (normal scan) or 56 s (accelerated scan)). Clinical treatment plans were recalculated on the synCT. The Hounsfield Units (HU) and dose-volume-histogram metrics were compared between the synCT and CT. Subsequently, synthetic treatment plans were generated to systematically assess dosimetry accuracy in different anatomical regions using dose-volume-histogram metrics. Results: The mean absolute error between the synCT and CT was 94 ± 11 HU inside the patient contour. For the clinical plans, 98.8% of PTV metrics deviated less than 2% between synCT and CT and all OAR metrics deviated less than 1 Gy. The synthetic plans showed larger dose differences depending on the location of the PTV. Conclusions: Excellent dose agreement was found based on clinical plans between the CT and a ZTE-MR-based synCT in the head-and-neck region. Synthetic plans are an important addition to clinical plans to evaluate the dosimetric accuracy of synCT scans.