Water Demand Forecasting Accuracy and Influencing Factors at Different Spatial Scales Using a Gradient Boosting Machine

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Maria Xenochristou (University of Exeter)

C Hutton (Wessex Water)

J. Hofman (University of Bath)

Zoran Kapelan (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering, University of Exeter)

Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Copyright
© 2020 Maria Xenochristou, C. Hutton, J. Hofman, Z. Kapelan
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026304
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Maria Xenochristou, C. Hutton, J. Hofman, Z. Kapelan
Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Issue number
8
Volume number
56
Pages (from-to)
1-15
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Understanding, comparing, and accurately predicting water demand at different spatial scales is an important goal that will allow effective targeting of the appropriate operational and conservation efforts under an uncertain future. This study uses data relating to water consumption available at the household level, as well as postcode locations, household characteristics, and weather data in order to identify the relationships between spatial scale, influencing factors, and forecasting accuracy. For this purpose, a Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) is used to predict water demand 1–7 days into the future. Results show an exponential decay in prediction accuracy from a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 3.2% to 17%, for a reduction in group size from 600 to 5 households. Adding explanatory variables to the forecasting model reduces the MAPE up to 20% for the peak days and smaller household groups (20–56 households), whereas for larger aggregations of properties (100–804 households), the range of improvement is much smaller (up to 1.2%). Results also show that certain types of input variables (past consumption and household characteristics) become more important for smaller aggregations of properties, whereas others (weather data) become less important.

Files

2019WR026304.pdf
(pdf | 2 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 29-12-2020
License info not available