Performance evaluation of real time control in urban wastewater systems in practice

Review and perspective

Journal Article (2017)
Author(s)

P.M.M. van Daal-Rombouts (Witteveen+Bos, TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)

Günter Gruber (Graz University of Technology)

JG Langeveld (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering, Partners4UrbanWater)

Dirk Muschalla (Graz University of Technology)

Francois H.L.R. Clemens (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering, Deltares)

Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Copyright
© 2017 P.M.M. van Daal-Rombouts, Günter Gruber, J.G. Langeveld, Dirk Muschalla, F.H.L.R. Clemens
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.015
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 P.M.M. van Daal-Rombouts, Günter Gruber, J.G. Langeveld, Dirk Muschalla, F.H.L.R. Clemens
Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Volume number
95
Pages (from-to)
90-101
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Real time control (RTC) is generally viewed as a viable method for optimising the performance of urban wastewater systems. A literature review on the performance evaluation of RTC demonstrated a lack of consensus on how to do this. Two main deficiencies were identified: omitting uncertainty analysis and applying limited evaluation periods. A general methodology to evaluate the performance of RTC in practice, that takes into account these deficiencies, is proposed. The methodology is either data or model driven and the (dis)advantages of each are discussed. In a case study for a combined sewer system with limited discharge to a WWTP, it is demonstrated that the successful application of RTC and the possibility to determine a significant effect is very much dependent on the goal. It also clearly illustrates the need for taking uncertainties into account and that careful consideration in the chosen evaluation period is required.

Files

Manuscript_clean_2_.pdf
(pdf | 2.02 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 22-06-2019