Vibrations In An Active Controlled Hexapod

Master thesis (2020)

Authors

W. Diederen Mechanical Engineering

Contributors

A. Metrikine Offshore Engineering - CEG (mentor)
V. Vaniushkina Offshore Engineering - CEG (graduation committee member)
Otto Kooy (coach)
Jasper Flohil (coach)
Faculty
Mechanical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Copyright: © 2020 Wouter Diederen
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

12-03-2020

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

The Ampelmann system occasionally starts vibrating unexpectedly, especially while the system is placed on a pedestal. These vibrations are believed to be caused by the eigenfrequencies of the system and/or amplification caused by the motion control algorithm. In this research an investigation in this phenomenon was done. This investigation was done via an analysis of the eigenfrequencies of the active controlled hexapod. A finite element method model was created to determine the eigenfrequencies of the system. This model was made using MATLAB and the toolbox StaBIL 2.0, created by the university of Leuven. All the elements of the system are modeled as beams except the hydraulic actuators. The properties of the elements which represent the hydraulic actuators are calculated separately using a modelling study on stiffness characteristics of hydraulic cylinder under multi-factors.
Possible causes for the unexpected vibrations have been investigated via measurements performed on Ampelmann systems. Data which was readily available is analyzed. Based on this data three possible causes have been determined. These are: the influence of the pedestal, residual motions due to limitations of the Ampelmann system and vibrations in the bottom frame due to compensating for gangway motions. To investigate the influence of the pedestal and the vibrations in the bottom frame two experiments have been performed. The residual motions have been investigated via calculations based on data already available. The amplitude of the response in the results from the first experiment performed to investigate the vibrations in the bottom frame due to gangway motions is negligible over the entire test period. The data from the calculations done to investigate the effect of the residual motions show no amplification. The results of the experiment and the calculations lead to the conclusion that these do not cause unwanted behavior. The second experiment to determine the influence of the pedestal shows four peaks in the frequency domain of both the signals. The first is directly caused by vessel motions. The other three have a cause which is not directly related to vessel motions. The data from the sensor on the Ampelmann system, at the top of the pedestal, does not contain a peak which is not present at the ship deck. From this it can be concluded that the eigenfrequencies of the pedestal do not have a relevant influence. For one of these peaks the amplitude of the graph related to the top of the pedestal is higher than the one corresponding to the ship deck. A possible explanation for this phenomenon could be the eigenfrequencies and corresponding eigenmodes of the ship deck. The pedestal functions as a leaver arm amplifying the rotations related to eigenmodes of the ship deck. This may cause the unexpected vibrations.