Averaging quantiles, variance shrinkage, and overconfidence

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

R. M. Cooke (TU Delft - Applied Probability)

Research Group
Applied Probability
Copyright
© 2022 R.M. Cooke
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.139
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 R.M. Cooke
Research Group
Applied Probability
Issue number
1
Volume number
5 (2023)
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Averaging quantiles as a way of combining experts' judgments is studied both mathematically and empirically. Quantile averaging is equivalent to taking the harmonic mean of densities evaluated at quantile points. A variance shrinkage law is established between equal and harmonic weighting. Data from 49 post-2006 studies are extended to include harmonic weighting in addition to equal and performance-based weighting. It emerges that harmonic weighting has the highest average information and degraded statistical accuracy. The hypothesis that the quantile average is statistically accurate would be rejected at the 5% level in 28 studies and at the 0.1% level in 15 studies. For performance weighting, these numbers are 3 and 1, for equal weighting 2 and 1.