Conclusion
Causehealth recommendations for making causal evidence clinically relevant and informed
Rani Lill Anjum (Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU))
S.M. Copeland (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)
Elena Rocca (Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU))
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
From the philosophical perspective presented in the first part of this book, together with the clinical application of this framework in the second part, it follows that we must change the way we approach causal evidence of health and illness conceptually, methodologically and practically. This has some practical consequences for the clinical encounter, as discussed throughout the book. We here offer some specific CauseHealth recommendations for making causal evidence more clinically relevant and better informed by the clinical encounter. The recommendations follow from an overall consideration of the previous chapters, both the philosophical framework and its clinical implications.
help_outline