Zero-acreage farming driving sustainable urban development

A spatial and technological comparison of urban agriculture farms

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Jan Hugo (University of Pretoria)

Chrisna du Plessis (University of Pretoria)

Andy van den Dobbelsteen (TU Delft - Climate Design and Sustainability)

Research Group
Climate Design and Sustainability
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.17.3.161 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Research Group
Climate Design and Sustainability
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.
Journal title
Journal of Green Building
Issue number
3
Volume number
17
Pages (from-to)
161-186
Downloads counter
334
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Zero-Acreage Farming (ZAF) recently developed as a novel land-use form and is aimed at addressing food security and sustainable urban development. While it is often lauded as a sustainable land-use form with potential to improve resource consumption and urban sustainability, little research into the spatial and technological requirements of this land-use form is available. This study undertakes a comparative analysis of ZAF and ground-based urban agriculture (UA) farms in diverse countries to differentiate their technical and spatial implementation parameters and uncover ZAF-specific characteristics and their implementation feasibility in rapidly developing cities. This qualitative study uses semi-structured interviews, triangulated with observational studies, to document ZAF and UA farms in South Africa, Belgium, the Netherlands and Singapore. The findings reveal UA as highly flexible, modular land-use forms while, contrastingly, the technological focus of ZAF farms often results in monofunctional and inflexible once implemented, isolated, and non-contextual solutions. While ZAF farms are appropriate to improve livelihoods and food security in dense urban contexts, the study highlights trends that must be addressed to promote the implementation of ZAF in poorer rapidly developing cities.

Files

I1943_4618_17_3_161.pdf
(pdf | 39.6 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-07-2023
License info not available