Full-field identification of elastic and shear moduli of perforated masonry walls using DIC and stiffness-based shear partition (Euler-Bernoulli vs Timoshenko)

Comparison across clay brick, calcium silicate brick, and calcium silicate block masonry

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

Navid Vafa (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Paul A. Korswagen (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Jan G. Rots (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Research Group
Applied Mechanics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.60628/9783738810400-1017 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Applied Mechanics
Pages (from-to)
1017-1026
Publisher
International Masonry Society
ISBN (electronic)
978-3-7388-1040-0
Event
11th International Masonry Conference 2026 (2026-07-12 - 2026-07-15), Musik-und Kongresshalle, Lübeck, Germany
Downloads counter
17
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Digital Image Correlation (DIC) is increasingly used in masonry testing for full-field crack mapping, yet its potential for quantitative identification of elastic properties at structural scale is still not fully exploited for perforated walls where load paths split into multiple piers. This contribution presents a DIC-driven procedure to estimate the Young’s modulus E and the shear modulus G of windowed masonry walls made of three materials: clay brick masonry, calcium silicate brick masonry, and calcium silicate block masonry. Axial strains are extracted at the wall extreme fibres and converted to E using section-dependent bending stresses that account for the reduced cross-section within the window height. For G, pier-average shear strains are obtained from DIC strain fields within defined regions of interest, while pier shear forces are computed by stiffness-based partition of the applied top shear between the left and right piers. Two bounds are considered: Euler–Bernoulli theory (shear-rigid) and Timoshenko theory (shear-flexible) with a shear correction factor. The comparison clarifies how the inferred G depends on pier aspect ratio and the assumed shear deformability. Finally, a parametric study is conducted to quantify how the assumed Poisson’s ratio affects the back-calculation of E from the measured G. The results further indicate that elastic parameters obtained from standard small-scale tests (e.g., prisms or wallets) tend to overestimate the effective E and G inferred at wall scale, which can significantly bias the calibration of continuum and macro-element numerical models.

Files