Towards a classification system for Modernist painters’ reworking practices illustrated by James Ensor’s revised paintings
Annelies Rios Casier (Universiteit Antwerpen)
Herwig Todts (Royal Museum of Fine Arts Antwerp)
Karen Bonne (Koninklijk Instituut voor het Kunstpatrimonium)
Maron Zwakman (Universiteit Antwerpen)
Letizia Monico (Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche, Università degli Studi di Perugia)
Patrick Atkinson (Nottingham Trent University)
Michela Botticelli (Istituto di Scienze del Patrimonio Culturale)
Matthias Alfeld (TU Delft - Team Matthias Alfeld)
Francisca Vandepitte (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)
undefined More Authors (External organisation)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Reworking paintings has been a common practice throughout art history, with artists modifying their own work at various stages and occasionally altering pieces by others. Advances in chemical imaging and increased access to traditional imaging techniques have facilitated the documentation of such interventions. Initially focused on Old Masters, research on reworking practices has expanded to nineteenth- and twentieth-century artists. For the first time, a classification system for reworkings is introduced, based on the oeuvre of Belgian Modernist painter James Ensor (1860–1949). Five representative case studies each illustrate one of the proposed types of reworking: (1) pentimenti, (2) post-factum revisions, (3) recycled works, (4) metamorphoses, and (5) appropriations. Using advanced imaging and spectroscopic techniques, including Macro X-Ray Fluorescence (MA-XRF) and instrumentation from the Iperion HS consortium, the study also provides material-technical evidence of Ensor’s experimental studio practice while shedding new light on anachronisms in his oeuvre.