A Data-drive Approach for Robust Cockpit Crew Training Scheduling

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Joey Van Kempen (TU Delft - Air Transport & Operations)

B. F. Lopes dos Santos (TU Delft - Air Transport & Operations)

L. Scherp (TU Delft - Air Transport & Operations)

Research Group
Air Transport & Operations
Copyright
© 2022 J. van Kempen, Bruno F. Santos, L. Scherp
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.053
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 J. van Kempen, Bruno F. Santos, L. Scherp
Research Group
Air Transport & Operations
Volume number
62
Pages (from-to)
424-431
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This work addresses the cockpit crew training scheduling problem. The objective is to produce a robust cockpit crew training schedule, including the assignment of trainees, instructors and simulators. To attain this objective, we propose a scheduling framework composed of four modules: a Training Scheduling & Assignment Model (TS&AM), a Disruption Generator (DG), a Rule-Based Recovery (RBR) algorithm, and a Neural Network (NN). The TS&AM is an integer programming model that integrates the scheduling of courses and the assignment of resources. The output roster serves as input for a data-driven DG based on Monte-Carlo Simulation. The disruptions are then solved using the RBR algorithm. Finally, The NN feedback algorithm learns the recovery costs experienced in the disruption impact simulator and updates these costs in the TS&AM to generate more robust rosters. The proposed modelling framework was calibrated, tested, and demonstrated in a simulation environment developed using four years of historical crew training data from a major European airline. The experiment showed that our approach outperformed the roster produced by the airline. The approach proposed produces rosters that reduce recovery costs by 21 percent, while still decreasing total training costs by 3 percent.