Research on shutdown purge characteristics of proton exchange membrane fuel cells
Purge parameters conspicuity and residual water
Zhenya Zhang (Zhengzhou University of Light Industry)
Houyu Wei (Henan University, Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry)
Yanqiu Xiao (Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Collaborative Innovation Center of Intelligent Tunnel Boring Machine)
Chuanxiao Cheng (Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Collaborative Innovation Center of Intelligent Tunnel Boring Machine)
Jiean Tian (G-POWER Technology)
Xinxin Li (G-POWER Technology)
Junrui Liu (G-POWER Technology)
Zhengxuan Liu (TU Delft - Design & Construction Management)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
This paper comprehensively investigates the purge mechanism of proton exchange membrane fuel cells during the shutdown process, which qualitatively examines the effect of purge parameters (including current density, stoichiometric ratio, and relative humidity) on water content variation, and further quantitatively investigates the remaining water content post-purge. In contrast to previous studies, this paper offers a novel perspective on analyzing the purge process and conducts a thorough examination of residual water content. This study presents a transient, isothermal, two-phase flow model for proton exchange membrane fuel cells, which is subsequently validated experimentally. Results indicate that the significance of purge parameters follows the descending order: stoichiometric ratio, relative humidity, and current density. During the purge, the stoichiometric ratio should be rapidly increased to above 9. Each incremental rise in the stoichiometric ratio from 6 to 14 leads to a respective reduction in residual membrane water content after purge of 2.19 %, 1.57 %, 1.18 %, 0.93 %, 0.76 %, 0.63 %, 0.53 %, and 0.46 %. Similarly, it is recommended to swiftly decrease relative humidity to below 40 %. Elevating the purge current density from 20 to 200 mA/cm2 decreases the time required to completely remove liquid water from 20.24 s to 6.59 s. Hence, employing a higher current density at the onset of the purge facilitates quicker removal of liquid water, albeit resulting in an increase in residual membrane water content post-purge, from 3.17 to 3.70. In summary, optimizing the purge strategy requires adjusting purge current densities according to the specific purge stage.
help_outline