Understanding acoustic annoyance and thermal perception interactions in an open-plan office across seasons

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Larissa Pereira de Souza (Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina)

Mateus Bavaresco (Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina)

Brenda da Costa Loeser (Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina)

Matheus Soares Geraldi (Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina)

Matheus Körbes Bracht (Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina)

Ana Paula Melo (Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina)

Roberto Lamberts (Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina)

Affiliation
External organisation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.114112 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Affiliation
External organisation
Journal title
Building and Environment
Volume number
289
Article number
114112
Downloads counter
5

Abstract

This study investigates the interplay between thermal perception and acoustic annoyance in an open-plan office in Southern Brazil’s hot and humid climate. Using environmental measurements and subjective assessments, the research explores how the thermal and acoustic environment across seasons, and the use of thermal Personalized Environmental Control Systems (PECS) affect occupants’ acoustic and thermal perceptions. Ten noise sources were analyzed to assess their association with acoustic annoyance and the resulting coping mechanisms like the willingness to use headphones (acoustic PECS). People’s activity and colleagues’ thermal PECS were the most common sources of acoustic annoyance. Seasonal patterns showed higher annoyance by people’s activity in summer while colleagues’ thermal PECS were more disturbing in winter due to the louder operation of portable heaters. Results from linear mixed-effect models further revealed that thermal sensation was mainly described by air temperature and participants’ PECS use, while cross-modal effects emerged for thermal pleasure, which was significantly associated with acoustic annoyance from colleagues’ PECS and people’s activity. Conversely, annoyance from people’s activity was explained only by noise levels, while annoyance from colleagues’ PECS was related to both thermal and acoustic factors. These findings highlight that cross-modal interactions selectively shape comfort evaluations and emphasize the role of personal and colleagues’ adaptive behaviors in shared workspaces. However, the relatively small sample size limits the generalization of the results, and future studies should include a larger and more diverse participant group to reinforce these findings.