PC-based hazard anticipation training for experienced cyclists

Design and evaluation

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Natalia Kovacsova (Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid (SWOV), TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

W. P. Vlakveld (Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid (SWOV))

J. C.F. Winter (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

Marjan Hagenzieker (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2020 N. Kovacsova, W. P. Vlakveld, J.C.F. de Winter, Marjan Hagenzieker
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104561
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 N. Kovacsova, W. P. Vlakveld, J.C.F. de Winter, Marjan Hagenzieker
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Volume number
123
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Research shows that the ability to anticipate safety-critical situations is predictive of safe performance in traffic. Thus far, hazard anticipation training has been developed mainly for car drivers. These training programs may not be appropriate for cyclists who are exposed to different types of hazards. This study aimed to develop a PC-based hazard anticipation training for experienced cyclists, and evaluate its short-term effectiveness using hazard anticipation tests. Sixty-six electric bicycle users completed either a hazard anticipation training or a control intervention. The hazard anticipation training consisted of videos divided into two modules (instructions and practice) and was designed using various evidence-based hazard anticipation educational methods such as a ‘What happens next?’ task, expert commentary, performance feedback, and analogical transfer between hazardous traffic situations. The evaluation of the training showed that cyclists from the training group identified hazards faster compared to the control group cyclists, but no significant difference was found in the number of detected hazards between the two groups. The training had a small positive effect on cyclists’ prediction accuracy at safety-critical intersection situations. No effect was found on perceived danger and risk in hazardous traffic situations. Our results suggest that experienced cyclists’ hazard anticipation skills can be improved with the developed PC-based training. Future research should evaluate the retention and transfer of learned skills.

Files

1_s2.0_S0925753519321721_main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 10.4 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 20-06-2020
License info not available