Assessing the Impact Damage Risk on Composite Structures

A method of predicting impact damage risk on composite aircraft fuselage by combining probability of detection and a decision risk matrix

Master thesis (2021)

Authors

L.C. Veldkamp Aerospace Engineering

Contributors

M. Lourenço Baptista Air Transport & Operations - Aerospace Engineering (supervisor 1)
Bruno F. Santos Air Transport & Operations - Aerospace Engineering (supervisor 2)
V.S.V. Dhanisetty (supervisor 2)
R.M. Groves Structural Integrity & Composites - Aerospace Engineering (supervisor 2)
Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
Copyright: © 2021 Lindsay Veldkamp
Machine learning Aircraft Composite structures Risk Analysis Probability of detection Visual inspection Impact damage
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

21-10-2021

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Aerospace Engineering

Abstract

Impact on composite structures shows a different damage behaviour compared to metal structures. Due to the current short operational life time of composite aircraft the risks of impact damages on composite structures are unknown. This paper proposes a new method for quantitative risk analysis of low velocity impact damages on composite aircraft structures by combining a conventional risk analysis with the probability of detection of the damages. Real damage data of metal structures is used to estimate impactors and to predict damages on composite structures by means of an aircraft impact damage model. To create a large set of impact events and to conduct a more accurate analysis impactor data estimated from the real metal damage data is augmented. Three fuselage sections with a significant difference in amount of damages have been selected to compare the different risk results. The outcome of a conventional risk analysis and the outcome of the probability of detection of damages show that the section with the highest amount of damages results into the highest risk. However, the proposed method by combining the probability of detection of the damages with a conventional risk analysis shows different and more revealing results. The fuselage section with nearly 50% less damages compared to the section with the highest damages appears to be the highest risk section but the difference with the other fuselage sections is small. The proposed risk analysis method intends to be a useful tool for aircraft maintenance organisations for a different approach of assessing the risks of impact damages on composite structures.