The Guidelines Challenge

Book Chapter (2020)
Author(s)

Samantha Copeland (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Copyright
© 2020 S.M. Copeland
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41239-5_6
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 S.M. Copeland
Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Pages (from-to)
95-110
ISBN (print)
9783030412388
ISBN (electronic)
9783030412395
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This chapter looks at one of the key problems experienced by practitioners of medicine today, especially in large or public institutions, which is how to handle guidelines. Public management approaches to medicine tend to promote guidelines as rules to follow, and clinicians often feel pressure to follow a guideline even when their judgment cautions them to do otherwise. This ‘tramline’ approach to guidelines, we show, is philosophically as well as practically problematic. Especially when we take dispositions as the ontology of the causal relations that guidelines want to key in on—the best way to cause a recovery, or to counteract the causes of a condition—we see that guidelines cannot and ought not be treated as rules to be followed. We thus also make suggestions in this chapter about what kinds of guidelines, in terms of form and function, might be ideal.