Correction: Entropy-Patch-Choked-Nozzle Interaction: Quasi-Steady-Modeling-Regime Limits Probed
K. Kowalski (University of Twente)
S.J. Hulshoff (TU Delft - Aerodynamics)
P. Ströer (University of Twente)
Jan Withag (University of Twente)
A. Genot (ONERA Centre de Toulouse)
A. S. Morgans (Imperial College London)
F. Bake (Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM))
K. Venner (University of Twente)
Martinus P.J. Sanders (University of Twente)
L. Hirschberg (University of Twente)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
In §II. Theory, two reduced-order models are proposed, which the authors have termed: the quasi-steady model (§II.A. Quasi-steady one-dimensional model) & the inertial/hybrid model (§II.B. Quasi-one-dimensional pointmass model), respectively. N.b., in both cases time dependence isn’t explicitly modeled, i.e., technically speaking both models are quasi-steady. Ergo, in hindsight, it would have been more apt to call the model proposed in §II.A.: the matching-condition model. With that in mind, the readership is encouraged to substitute “matching-condition model/modeling regime” instead of “quasi-steady model/modeling regime,” when reading this conference paper. Moreover, the following title would have been more suitable: “Entropy-patch chokednozzle interaction: matching-condition and inertial modeling-regimes mapped”.