The Changing Faces of Farmer-Led Irrigation

Lessons from Dynamic Irrigation Trajectories in Kenya and Zimbabwe

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Annelieke E.C. Duker (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

Sambulisiwe Maseko (Dabane Trust Water Workshops)

Mehluli A. Moyo (Dabane Trust Water Workshops)

Benson M. Karimba (Meru University of Science and Technology)

Alex Bolding (Wageningen University & Research)

Pooja Prasad (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

Charlotte de Fraiture (Wageningen University & Research, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

Pieter van der Zaag (TU Delft - Water Resources, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2023.2204176 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Issue number
9
Volume number
59
Pages (from-to)
1317-1336
Downloads counter
217
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Farmer-led irrigation is valued for its resilience and ability to cope with shocks and benefit from opportunities. Yet, typologies of farmer-led irrigation are mostly static categorisations without analysing farmers’ decision-making over time, and without studying ‘failed’ cases. We therefore analysed temporal changes in farmers’ irrigation strategies to expand, downscale or cease practices as part of wider livelihood decisions and aspirations. This longitudinal study presents irrigation trajectories of 32 farmers in the arid lands of two contrasting socioeconomic settings in Kenya and Zimbabwe. Data were collected through multiple rounds of surveys and in-depth interviews. Results show that farmers frequently alternated strategies or ceased or restarted operations over the years, both by force and choice. Although many farmers were able to start, expand or sustain irrigation, not all managed or aspired to remain engaged in irrigated farming, even if the enabling environment was conducive for market-oriented irrigation development. We therefore conclude that farmers’ needs cannot always be expressed in general terms of growth or commercial farming, nor can they always be satisfied by improving the enabling environment, which may be based on static ontologies of diverse types of farmers.