The emergence of digital ecosystem governance

An investigation of responses to disrupted resource control in the Swedish public transport sector

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Hosea Ofe (TU Delft - Information and Communication Technology)

Johan Sandberg (Umeå University)

Research Group
Information and Communication Technology
Copyright
© 2023 H.A. Ofe, Johan Sandberg
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12404
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 H.A. Ofe, Johan Sandberg
Research Group
Information and Communication Technology
Issue number
2
Volume number
33
Pages (from-to)
350-384
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Digital ecosystem governance entails the management of complex, dynamic power relationships. As entrant platform providers seek to cultivate an ecosystem, they must carefully navigate these power relationships when dealing with governance tensions. Providers generally seek to leverage the ecosystem's generative potential by facilitating a variety of interactions and distributing design rights. Simultaneously, they need to ensure stability and order by imposing rules that resolve contentious matters and restrict ecosystem participants' degrees of freedom. This study explores how and why providers can induce ecosystem actors to engage in collaborative negotiation regarding such governance tensions through a case study of the introduction of an open data platform in the Swedish public transport sector. Our analysis offers three main contributions. First, it provides an empirical demonstration that entrepreneurial threats, as well as opportunities, can trigger platform launches and drive collaborative negotiation of digital ecosystem governance. Second, it extends conceptualizations of boundary resources beyond the current focus on transactional elements by demonstrating the role of interactive boundary resources in the negotiation of governance grounded in both social and systemic power relationships. Third, it shows how positive reinforcement can complement punitive measures to increase acceptance of design rules.