Review of Advances in the Robotization of Timber Construction

Review (2025)
Author(s)

F.C. Cheng (National Cheng Kung University, TU Delft - History, Form & Aesthetics)

H.H. Bier (University of Sydney, TU Delft - Building Knowledge)

Ningzhu Wang (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology)

Alisa Andrasek (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology)

Research Group
Building Knowledge
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203747
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Building Knowledge
Issue number
20
Volume number
15
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The construction industry faces persistent productivity shortfalls and rising carbon dioxide emissions, which drives a shift toward the use of low-carbon materials and higher degrees of automation. Timber, a renewable and carbon-sequestering material, becomes especially compelling when combined with robotic fabrication. Although rapid advances have been implemented in the last decade, research and practice remain fragmented, and systematic evaluations of technological readiness are scarce. This gap is addressed in this review through critical literature synthesis of robotic timber construction, combining bibliometric analysis with a comparative evaluation of twelve representative case studies from 2020 to 2025. Computational and robotic tools are mapped across the design to fabrication pipeline, and emerging advancements are identified such as digital twins, real-time adaptive workflows, and machine learning driven fabrication, alongside discrete and circular strategies. Barriers to scale up are also assessed, including mid-level technology readiness, regulatory and safety obligations for human–robot interaction, evidence on cost and productivity, and workforce training needs. By clarifying the current level of robotization and specifying both research gaps and industrial prerequisites, this study provides a structured foundation for the next phase of development. It helps scholars by consolidating methods and metrics for rigorous evaluation, and it helps practitioners by highlighting pathways to scalable, certifiable, and circular deployment that align cost, safety, and training requirements.