Toward improved cost guidelines for advanced low-carbon technologies
Edward S. Rubin (Carnegie Mellon University)
Niels Berghout (International Energy Agency)
George Booras (Electric Power Research Institute)
Timothy Fout (National Energy Technology Laboratory)
Monica Garcia (IEAGHG)
Shareq Mohd Nazir (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Andrea Ramirez (TU Delft - ChemE/Chemical Engineering)
Simon Roussanaly (SINTEF Energy Resarch)
Mijndert van der Spek (Heriot-Watt University)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
This paper presents a framework for estimating the future Nth-of-a-kind (NOAK) cost of advanced low-carbon technologies that are currently at early pre-commercial stages of development. It identifies two types of question that commonly motivate a cost analysis: “What If” questions about the hypothetical future cost of a technology that meets specified R&D goals or requirements; and “What Will” questions regarding the true expected cost of an advanced technology once it is mature and widely deployed. The latter type of question is the focus of this paper. It addresses shortcomings in the “bottom up” engineering-economic method current used to estimate NOAK costs. It describes a more rigorous hybrid costing method that combines a bottom-up analysis of the first-of-a-kind (FOAK) commercial cost of an advanced technology with an empirical model employing experience curves to project its future cost. Guidelines are presented for all phases of the analysis.