Lessons Learned from Field Operational Test of Integrated Network Management in Amsterdam

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

S.P. Hoogendoorn (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Jaap van Kooten (Arane)

R Adams (Praktijkproef Amsterdam)

Transport and Planning
Copyright
© 2016 S.P. Hoogendoorn, J van Kooten, R Adams
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3141/2554-12
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 S.P. Hoogendoorn, J van Kooten, R Adams
Transport and Planning
Issue number
12
Volume number
2554
Pages (from-to)
111–119
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The Amsterdam Practical Trial (APT) is a multiyear program initiated by the Dutch Ministry of Transport and the Environment and is carried out in close cooperation by Rijkswaterstaat, the City of Amsterdam, the Province of North Holland, and the Amsterdam Metropolitan Region. The APT aims to integrate innovative roadside and in-car developments networkwide. After the proof of concept was finished in 2009, two parallel tracks started in the Amsterdam region: the roadside track (aiming at an innovative, automated working system with ramp metering and traffic lights) and the in-car track (aiming at individualized travel and traffic information in the car for commuter traffic and for large-event traffic). This paper aims specifically at the innovative APT roadside system. Development of this system began in 2012, with the system becoming operational in April 2014. After all technical and functional tests were completed, the system parameters were tuned and finalized the implementation phase. Starting April 14, 11 weeks were taken to collect the data for the ex post assessment. In doing so, the authors have used an alternating assessment design, implemented by switching the system on and off every week so that a fair comparison could be made. From the collected data, it could be concluded that while the system caused additional delays on the urban network and ramps, the throughput on the freeway arterial was improved. Detailed analysis of the data showed the system performed as expected and which improvements can be made to further increase its effectiveness. These optimizations are discussed, as are the expected effects of implementing them in the system. How they are operationalized in Phase 2 of this innovative project will also be discussed.

Files

2554_12.pdf
(pdf | 2.47 Mb)
License info not available