Time After Time: Community‐Led Participation in Urban Development Practices in Rotterdam

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Francisco Santos (peer_protocol foundation)

Alice Jelmini (Global Infrastructure Basel Foundation)

Pierre Kauter (Creative Regenerative Dynamic)

C. Mazzarella (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Research Group
Real Estate Management
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.11846 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Real Estate Management
Journal title
Urban Planning
Volume number
11
Article number
11846
Downloads counter
10
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Community-led initiatives are increasingly recognised as contributors to sustainable and socially just urban transitions, but their capacity to shape formal urban development processes remains insufficiently understood. This article examines a grassroots case in Rotterdam, TheSpace_Coolhaven (2021–2024), and its nomadic successor, the Coolhaven Beating Heart Participatory Quest (2025), to explore how temporary commoning can configure city-making over time. Grounded in theoretical work on urban commons, temporary urbanism, and participatory governance, the study applies the access, membership, and ownership (AMO) framework within a longitudinal action-research methodology, drawing on participatory observation, internal documentation, workshop outputs, communication material, and six semi-structured interviews with community and institutional actors. Findings indicate that temporary access to vacant social housing enabled urban commons to be prefigurative, characterised by intensive socio-cultural programming, shared stewardship, and informal knowledge infrastructures. This temporary commons fostered collective learning and proximity-based governance. Yet, it also demonstrated fragility under property-led redevelopment, facing a nomadic condition in between institutional time frames. The article argues that community-led initiatives should be recognised as urban commons infrastructure with the potential to inform more inclusive, collaborative, and reflexive approaches to urban development in the Netherlands and comparable contexts.