Socio-ecological evaluation of estuary-scale interventions

Case study of reopening the Haringvliet, the Netherlands

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Gijs G. Hendrickx (HKV Lijn in Water, TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Gregory S. Fivash (Universiteit Antwerpen)

Avelon Gerritsma (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Marlein Geraeds (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Stuart G. Pearson (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences, TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Research Group
Mathematical Physics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.108031 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Mathematical Physics
Journal title
Ecological Engineering
Volume number
230
Article number
108031
Downloads counter
11
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Estuaries are considered valuable regions, both socio-economically and ecologically. The gradients in physical characteristics like salinity present result in a high biodiversity, while the provision of many ecosystem services have attracted human settlement and activity. Human activities and estuarine biodiversity are often at odds with each others, leading to socio-ecological trade-offs in decision- and policy-making in which the ecological perspective is generally underrepresented. In this study, we implemented a hydrodynamic model to explore the socio-ecological implications of reopening the closed-off Haringvliet estuary in the Netherlands. Our socio-ecological evaluation considers the trade-off between freshwater availability and ecological diversity. In the case of the Haringvliet, we have shown that partially opening the gates enhances diversity in the system against no — or limited — loss of freshwater availability. All in all, the use of representative (non-monetary) performance indicators for the considered stakeholders allowed us to demonstrate the trade-offs in a clear fashion: the Pareto-front resulting from these performance indicators is an intuitive visualization for decision- and policy-makers as well as the communication to the public.