What is all this fuss about Tus?

Comparison of recent findings from biophysical and biochemical experiments

Journal Article (2017)
Author(s)

Bojk Berghuis (TU Delft - BN/Nynke Dekker Lab)

Vlad-Stefan Raducanu (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)

Mohamed M. Elshenawy (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)

Slobodan Jergic (University of Wollongong)

SM Depken (TU Delft - BN/Martin Depken Lab)

NE Dixon (University of Wollongong)

Samir M. Hamdan (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)

N.H. Dekker (TU Delft - BN/Nynke Dekker Lab)

Research Group
BN/Nynke Dekker Lab
Copyright
© 2017 B.A. Berghuis, Vlad-Stefan Raducanu, Mohamed M. Elshenawy, Slobodan Jergic, S.M. Depken, NE Dixon, Samir M. Hamdan, N.H. Dekker
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/10409238.2017.1394264
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 B.A. Berghuis, Vlad-Stefan Raducanu, Mohamed M. Elshenawy, Slobodan Jergic, S.M. Depken, NE Dixon, Samir M. Hamdan, N.H. Dekker
Research Group
BN/Nynke Dekker Lab
Pages (from-to)
1-15
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Synchronizing the convergence of the two-oppositely moving DNA replication machineries at specific termination sites is a tightly coordinated process in bacteria. In Escherichia coli, a “replication fork trap” – found within a chromosomal region where forks are allowed to enter but not leave – is set by the protein–DNA roadblock Tus–Ter. The exact sequence of events by which Tus–Ter blocks replisomes approaching from one direction but not the other has been the subject of controversy for many decades. Specific protein–protein interactions between the nonpermissive face of Tus and the approaching helicase were challenged by biochemical and structural studies. These studies show that it is the helicase-induced strand separation that triggers the formation of new Tus–Ter interactions at the nonpermissive face – interactions that result in a highly stable “locked” complex. This controversy recently gained renewed attention as three single-molecule-based studies scrutinized this elusive Tus–Ter mechanism – leading to new findings and refinement of existing models, but also generating new questions. Here, we discuss and compare the findings of each of the single-molecule studies to find their common ground, pinpoint the crucial differences that remain, and push the understanding of this bipartite DNA–protein system further.