Determination of organic fluorinated compounds content in complex samples through combustion ion chromatography methods
a way to define a “Total Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)” parameter?
Babatoundé I.T. Idjaton (Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières , Université Paris Cité)
Anne Togola (Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières )
Jean Philippe Ghestem (Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières )
Laura Kastler (Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières )
Sébastien Bristeau (Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières )
Mariska Ronteltap ( Hoogheemraadschap van Delfland, TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)
Stéfan Colombano (Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières )
Nicolas Devau (Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières )
Julie Lions (Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières )
Eric D. van Hullebusch (Université Paris Cité)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Emerging contaminants are a growing concern for scientists and public authorities. The group of per-polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), known as ‘forever chemicals', in complex environmental liquid and solid matrices was analysed in this study. The development of global analytical methods based on combustion ion chromatography (CIC) is expected to provide accurate picture of the overall PFAS contamination level via the determination of extractable organic fluorine (EOF) and adsorbable organic fluorine (AOF). The obtained results may be put into perspective with other methods such as targeted analyses (LC-MS/MS). The impact of pH, the presence of dissolved organic carbon and suspended particles on AOF measurements were explored. The effectiveness of the washing step to remove adsorbed inorganic fluorine (IF) has been proven for samples containing up to 8 mgF.L−1. CIC-based methods showed good repeatability and reproducibility for the complex matrices studied. Environmental applications of these methods have been tested. AOF and EOF analyses could explain between 1 % and 23 % and 0.1 % to 2 % of total organic fluorine (TOF), respectively. The sum of PFAS compounds expressed as fluorine could explain from 0.2 % to 11 % and from 0.003 % to 5 % for AOF and EOF, respectively. These results also suggest that some fluorinated compounds are not adsorbed or extractable and/or lost by volatilisation during the application of AOF and EOF analytical procedure. These findings highlight that AOF and EOF are not entirely efficient as proxy to assess “total PFAS” for assessing environmental contamination by PFAS. However, these methods could still be applied to gain a better understanding of the sources and fate of PFAS in the environment.