Preliminary results testing what different design solutions arise from different sustainable design methods

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Jeremy Faludi (Dartmouth College)

Omar Ali (American University of Beirut)

Ola Srour (American University of Beirut)

Selim Mecanna (American University of Beirut)

Rami Kamareddine (University of Balamand)

Tejaswini Chatty (Dartmouth College)

Affiliation
External organisation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.342
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Affiliation
External organisation
Volume number
2019-August
Pages (from-to)
3351-3360

Abstract

Do different sustainable design methods generate different sustainable design ideas? Do they also drive different product innovation ideas? This project empirically tested three design methods: The Natural Step, Whole System Mapping, and Biomimicry. Testing involved qualitatively categorizing 1,115 design ideas from 23 workshops for over 30 companies, including consultancies and manufacturers in consumer electronics, furniture, and apparel. The categorized ideas were then counted to determine if the different design methods caused different kinds of ideas. They did. For example, The Natural Step drove more ideas on green material choice, circular end of life, and social impacts, while Biomimicry drove more durability ideas and Whole System Mapping drove more cost reduction ideas, among other differences. Overall, The Natural Step generated the highest percentage of sustainability ideas, Biomimicry generated the most innovation ideas, and Whole System Mapping generated a balance of both. These preliminary results should help designers and engineers choose design methods suited to the types of design solutions they desire.

No files available

Metadata only record. There are no files for this record.