Changing perspectives on Gdansk Shipyard redevelopment

Story of the complex and dynamic interrelation of interests in the area of fallen industry

Student Report (2022)
Author(s)

M.K. Adamik (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Contributor(s)

Hilde Sennema – Mentor (TU Delft - History, Form & Aesthetics)

Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Copyright
© 2022 Marta Adamik
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Marta Adamik
Graduation Date
20-04-2022
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
Architectural History Thesis
Programme
Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The thesis tackles the topic of the redevelopment of Gdańsk Shipyard. It is a historically, architecturally, and emotionally important space, both for the city but also for Poland and Europe. Throughout the years there were many visions on how to tackle this difficult space. The thesis constructs a timeline that assigns actions undertaken by various stakeholders throughout the last 25 years (1996-2021). Additionally much more information and diverse material are being added based on information present in public debate. More attention is brought to the citizens being equal stakeholder as well as additional material is documented on recent years' planning.
The starting point for analysis is the bankruptcy of the shipyard in 1996 and the end are most recent events and projects done in the area. The timeline together with an analysis of the current situation aims to see how the urban views shifted during that time and what has changed. Additionally, the aim is to try to answer questions currently present in the public debate like:
Are the current plans better than before, or is it simply a disguise of profit-oriented development? Will the historical, physical and emotional heritage be preserved? What are the key aspects of focus for the improvement of the process of redeveloping the area?

Files

License info not available