Citizen preferences regarding the public funding of projects promoting a healthy body weight among people with a low income

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Lisanne S. Mulderij (Wageningen University & Research)

J.I. Hernandez (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)

Niek Mouter (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)

Kirsten T. Verkooijen (Wageningen University & Research)

Annemarie Wagemakers (Wageningen University & Research)

Research Group
Transport and Logistics
Copyright
© 2021 Lisanne S. Mulderij, J.I. Hernández, N. Mouter, Kirsten T. Verkooijen, Annemarie Wagemakers
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114015
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 Lisanne S. Mulderij, J.I. Hernández, N. Mouter, Kirsten T. Verkooijen, Annemarie Wagemakers
Research Group
Transport and Logistics
Volume number
280
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Overweight and obesity are a growing problem, especially among people with a low income. Policymakers aspire to alleviate this problem by implementing publicly funded projects. This study has three aims: 1) to explore citizen preferences regarding the public funding of projects promoting a healthy body weight among people with a low income, 2) to identify whether such preferences differ between citizens with a low income and those with a higher income, and 3) to identify the reasons underlying these preferences. We conducted a Participatory Value Evaluation (PVE) among 1053 Dutch citizens to achieve these aims. In an online choice experiment, respondents were asked to advise on the implementation of eight different projects that encourage a healthy body weight among citizens with a low income, with a total resource constraint of 100,000 euros. The projects were 1) lifestyle coaching including sports, 2) lifestyle coaching without sports, 3) local sports coach, 4) fruit and vegetable boxes, 5) bariatric surgery, 6) improving the living environment, 7) courses on healthy lifestyles, and 8) sports vouchers. We used the “Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value” model to estimate the preferences of respondents towards these eight projects. Fruit and vegetable boxes and sports vouchers were the most popular projects, while bariatric surgery was least popular. Respondents with a low income tended to spend less of the budget than respondents with a higher income. Respondent arguments for the choices they made were qualitatively analysed using inductive content analysis. They often mentioned the value judgements ‘importance’, ‘healthiness’ and ‘usefulness’, as well as project costs and efficacy, as reasons for their decisions. Policymakers could use the results to ensure their decisions on the allocation of public funding to projects that encourage a healthy weight among people with a low income are aligned with citizen preferences.