Various methods to correlate the state of practice asphalt mixture laboratory aging conditioning methods with field aging durations
Lijun Sun (Southeast University)
Runhua Zhang (University of Wisconsin-Madison)
Xingyu Gu (Southeast University)
Rui Wang (University of Wisconsin-Madison)
Qifeng Yang (Southeast University)
Weiguang Zhang (Southeast University)
P. Lin (TU Delft - Pavement Engineering)
D. Wang (University of Ottawa)
Wei Cai (Henan Polytechnic University)
Yaohan Liu (Chang'an University)
Hui Chen (Texas A&M University)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
The aging of asphalt pavements leads to less flexible asphalt mixtures that are prone to cracking and spalling. In this study, the relationship between lab and field aging was evaluated based on both theoretical asphalt aging models and practical asphalt and asphalt mixture performance tests. The results show that the corresponding field aging duration calculated using the mixture testing, especially the cracking test, is more conservative than the traditional aging models or binder rheological measurements. 5 and 12 days appear to simulate 16 and 38 years of field aging (in New Hampshire) for the top 12.5 mm pavement, respectively, based on the asphalt binder test results. In contrast, the theoretical aging model considers climatic conditions and suggests that 5 and 12 days simulate in-field aging of 6.2 and 15.0 years, respectively. The asphalt mixture test results indicate that the laboratory aging conditions simulate minimal field aging durations. This is because the damage to the asphalt pavement structure caused by climatic conditions and traffic loads is fully considered. This could be very useful for designing a more reliable and durable pavement incorporating intricate field conditions.