Collaborative planning for intermodal transport with eco-label preferences

Journal Article (2022)
Authors

Yimeng Zhang (TU Delft - Transport Engineering and Logistics)

Arne Heinold (Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel)

Frank Meisel (Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel)

R. R. Negenborn (TU Delft - Transport Engineering and Logistics)

B. Atasoy (TU Delft - Transport Engineering and Logistics)

Research Group
Transport Engineering and Logistics
Copyright
© 2022 Y. Zhang, Arne Heinold, Frank Meisel, R.R. Negenborn, B. Atasoy
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103470
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Y. Zhang, Arne Heinold, Frank Meisel, R.R. Negenborn, B. Atasoy
Related content
Research Group
Transport Engineering and Logistics
Volume number
112
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103470
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Sustainability is a common concern in intermodal transport. Collaboration among carriers may help in reducing emissions. In this context, this work establishes a collaborative planning model for intermodal transport and uses eco-labels (a series of different levels of emission ranges) to reflect shippers’ sustainability preferences. A mathematical model and an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search heuristic are proposed for intermodal transport planning of carriers and fuzzy set theory is used to model the preferences towards eco-labels. For multiple carriers, centralized, auction-based collaborative, and non-collaborative planning approaches are proposed and compared. Real data from barge, train and truck carriers in the European Rhine-Alpine corridor is used for extensive experiments where both unimodal carrier collaboration and intermodal carrier collaboration are analyzed. Compared with non-collaborative planning without eco-labels, the number of served requests increases and emissions decrease significantly in the collaborative planning with eco-labels as transport capacity is better utilized.