Ripple Effects of Law Execution Automation in Governmental Systems

The Wajong Case

Master Thesis (2022)
Author(s)

L.A. Pel (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Contributor(s)

R. I.J. Dobbe – Mentor (TU Delft - Information and Communication Technology)

I Nikolic – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - System Engineering)

Haiko Van Der Voort – Coach (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

Faculty
Technology, Policy and Management
Copyright
© 2022 Laurie Pel
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Laurie Pel
Graduation Date
01-11-2022
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Engineering and Policy Analysis
Faculty
Technology, Policy and Management
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The use of Automated Decision Making (ADM) systems in the public sector will become increasingly prevalent in the future, making citizens increasingly likely to be confronted with decisions that have been made fully automatically, without human intervention. Ever more digitization increases the opaqueness of the social benefits system in the Netherlands and leads to citizens facing most of the adverse, sometimes unforeseen effects of automation. Why and how unsafeness and unexpected effects emerge is not well known. In this research, these effects, defined to be ripple effects, are explored using a system safety lens and proposing an agent-based model design to explore why and how the effects emerge.

The leading cause of ripple effects was found to be the lack of a hierarchical safety structure, seen in laws being organized per organization, and the lack of an overarching controller to ensure that overlap does not occur.
This is partly due to a lack of an accurate model representing a Dutch citizen. Several policy recommendations are presented, including a rudimentary set-up on how to apply a safety control structure within the social benefits system.

Files

License info not available