Removal of bacterial and viral indicator organisms in full-scale aerobic granular sludge and conventional activated sludge systems

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Mary Luz Barrios Hernandez (TU Delft - BT/Environmental Biotechnology, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

Mario Pronk (TU Delft - BT/Environmental Biotechnology, Royal HaskoningDHV)

H. A. Garcia (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

Arne Boersma (Royal HaskoningDHV)

D Brdanovic (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, TU Delft - BT/Environmental Biotechnology)

M. C M van Loosdrecht (TU Delft - BT/Environmental Biotechnology)

Christine Maria Hooijmans (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

Research Group
BT/Environmental Biotechnology
Copyright
© 2020 M.L. Barrios Hernandez, M. Pronk, H. Garcia, Arne Boersma, Damir Brdjanovic, Mark C.M. van Loosdrecht, Christine M. Hooijmans
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2019.100040
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 M.L. Barrios Hernandez, M. Pronk, H. Garcia, Arne Boersma, Damir Brdjanovic, Mark C.M. van Loosdrecht, Christine M. Hooijmans
Research Group
BT/Environmental Biotechnology
Volume number
6
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the novel aerobic granular sludge (AGS) wastewater treatment technology in removing faecal indicator organisms (FIOs) compared to the conventional activated sludge (CAS) treatment system. The work was carried out at two full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) in the Netherlands, Vroomshoop and Garmerwolde. Both treatment plants have a CAS and AGS system operated in parallel. The parallel treatment lines are provided with the same influent wastewater. The concentrations of the measured FIOs in the influent of the two WWTPs were comparable with reported literature values as follows: F-specific RNA bacteriophages at 106 PFU/100 mL, and Escherichia coli (E. coli), Enterococci, and Thermotolerant coliforms (TtC) at 105 to 106 CFU/100 mL. Although both systems (CAS and AGS) are different in terms of design, operation, and microbial community, both systems showed similar FIOs removal efficiency. At the Vroomshoop WWTP, Log10 removals for F-specific RNA bacteriophages of 1.4 ± 0.5 and 1.3 ± 0.6 were obtained for the AGS and CAS systems, while at the Garmerwolde WWTP, Log10 removals for F-specific RNA bacteriophages of 1.9 ± 0.7 and 2.1 ± 0.7 were found for the AGS and CAS systems. Correspondingly, E. coli, Enterococci, and TtC Log10 removals of 1.7 ± 0.7 and 1.1 ± 0.7 were achieved for the AGS and CAS systems at Vroomshoop WWTP. For Garmerwolde WWTP Log10 removals of 2.3 ± 0.8 and 1.9 ± 0.7 for the AGS and CAS systems were found, respectively. The measured difference in removal rates between the plants was not significant. Physicochemical water quality parameters, such as the concentrations of organic matter, nutrients, and total suspended solids (TSS) were also determined. Overall, it was not possible to establish a direct correlation between the physicochemical parameters and the removal of FIOs for any of the treatment systems (CAS and AGS). Only the removal of TSS could be positively correlated to the E. coli removal for the AGS technology at the evaluated WWTPs.