An online adaptive plan library approach for intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancer

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Michelle Oud (Erasmus MC)

Sebastiaan Breedveld (Erasmus MC)

Marta Giżyńska (HollandPTC)

Michiel Kroesen (Erasmus MC, HollandPTC)

Stefan Hutschemaekers (HollandPTC)

S.J.M. Habraken (Erasmus MC, HollandPTC)

Steven Petit (Erasmus MC)

Z. Perko (TU Delft - RST/Reactor Physics and Nuclear Materials)

Ben J.M. Heijmen (Erasmus MC)

M.S. Hoogeman (Erasmus MC, HollandPTC)

Research Group
RST/Reactor Physics and Nuclear Materials
Copyright
© 2022 Michelle Oud, Sebastiaan Breedveld, Marta Giżyńska, Michiel Kroesen, Stefan Hutschemaekers, S.J.M. Habraken, Steven Petit, Z. Perko, Ben Heijmen, M.S. Hoogeman
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.09.011
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Michelle Oud, Sebastiaan Breedveld, Marta Giżyńska, Michiel Kroesen, Stefan Hutschemaekers, S.J.M. Habraken, Steven Petit, Z. Perko, Ben Heijmen, M.S. Hoogeman
Research Group
RST/Reactor Physics and Nuclear Materials
Volume number
176
Pages (from-to)
68-75
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background and purpose: In intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), the impact of setup errors and anatomical changes is commonly mitigated by robust optimization with population-based setup robustness (SR) settings and offline replanning. In this study we propose and evaluate an alternative approach based on daily plan selection from patient-specific pre-treatment established plan libraries (PLs). Clinical implementation of the PL strategy would be rather straightforward compared to daily online re-planning. Materials and methods: For 15 head-and-neck cancer patients, the planning CT was used to generate a PL with 5 plans, robustly optimized for increasing SR: 0, 1, 2, 3, 5 mm, and 3% range robustness. Repeat CTs (rCTs) and realistic setup and range uncertainty distributions were used for simulation of treatment courses for the PL approach, treatments with fixed SR (fSR3) and a trigger-based offline adaptive schedule for 3 mm SR (fSR3OfA). Daily plan selection in the PL approach was based only on recomputed dose to the CTV on the rCT. Results: Compared to using fSR3 and fSR3OfA, the risk of xerostomia grade ≥ II & III and dysphagia ≥ grade III were significantly reduced with the PL. For 6/15 patients the risk of xerostomia and/or dysphagia ≥ grade II could be reduced by > 2% by using PL. For the other patients, adherence to target coverage constraints was often improved. fSR3OfA resulted in significantly improved coverage compared to PL for selected patients. Conclusion: The proposed PL approach resulted in overall reduced NTCPs compared to fSR3 and fSR3OfA at limited cost in target coverage.