Towards adaptive stage-flow rating curve for large lowland river streams on the lower Tisza River with backwater impacts using deep learning and copula approach
Milan Stojković (The Research and Development Institute for Artificial Intelligence of Serbia, University of Novi Sad)
Milan Dotlić (The Research and Development Institute for Artificial Intelligence of Serbia)
Luka Vinokić (The Research and Development Institute for Artificial Intelligence of Serbia)
Zoran Kapelan (University of Belgrade, TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)
Slobodan Kolaković (University of Novi Sad)
Veljko Prodanović (The Research and Development Institute for Artificial Intelligence of Serbia, University of New South Wales)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
AbstractStudy region and rationale: The case study focuses on two hydrological stations on the lower Tisza River (Serbia and Hungary), located on a large lowland river stream strongly influenced by the downstream Novi Bečej reservoir (Serbia), where backwater effects and long-term hydraulic variability pose significant challenges for accurate flow estimation.Methods and dataConventional approaches that assume a stable stage-flow relationship fail to capture rating curve complexity. To address these limitations, this study introduces a joint machine learning (ML)–copula framework in which ML-based rating models are developed and verified on measured data and stochastically generated synthetic stage-flow pairs using a Gumbel copula. The framework integrates traditional power-law regression with Support Vector Regression (SVR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks (KAN), and evaluates uncertainty through confidence intervals and performance metrics (MAE, RMSE, MAPE, R², PICP).Main results and conclusionsML models outperform classical power regression across low, mean, and high flows, with SVR, MLP, and KAN achieving RMSE ≈ 78–163 m³ /s compared to RMSE ≈ 80–173 m³ /s for power regression. Under synthetic Gumbel-generated datasets, KAN maintains performance comparable to SVR (RMSE ≈ 129–212 m³/s) and preserves stable behavior across flow regimes, avoiding the underprediction observed in MLP. Consequently, KAN demonstrates the robustness necessary for adaptive stage-flow rating curve estimation under changing hydraulic conditions.