Directionality of corticomuscular coupling in essential tremor and cortical myoclonic tremor

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

S. Sharifi (Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC)

Frauke Luft (University of Twente)

S. Potgieter

T. Heida (University of Twente)

Winfred Mugge (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

AC Schouten (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

L. J. Bour (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

A. F. van Rootselaar (Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2021 S. Sharifi, F. Luft, S. Potgieter, T. Heida, W. Mugge, A.C. Schouten, L. J. Bour, A. F. van Rootselaar
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.04.011
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 S. Sharifi, F. Luft, S. Potgieter, T. Heida, W. Mugge, A.C. Schouten, L. J. Bour, A. F. van Rootselaar
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Issue number
8
Volume number
132
Pages (from-to)
1878-1886
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Objective: A role of the motor cortex in tremor generation in essential tremor (ET) is assumed, yet the directionality of corticomuscular coupling is unknown. Our aim is to clarify the role of the motor cortex. To this end we also study ‘familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy’ (FCMTE) and slow repetitive voluntary movements with a known cortical drive. Methods: Directionality of corticomuscular coupling (EEG-EMG) was studied with renormalized partial directed coherence (rPDC) during tremor in 25 ET patients, 25 healthy controls (mimicked) and in seven FCMTE patients; and during a self-paced 2 Hz task in eight ET patients and seven healthy controls. Results: Efferent coupling around tremor frequency was seen in 33% of ET patients, 45.5% of healthy controls, all FCMTE patients, and, around 2 Hz, in all ET patients and all healthy controls. Ascending coupling, seen in the majority of all participants, was weaker in ET than in healthy controls around 5–6 Hz. Conclusions: Possible explanations are that tremor in ET results from faulty subcortical output bypassing the motor cortex; rate-dependent transmission similar to generation of rhythmic movements; and/or faulty feedforward mechanism resulting from decreased afferent (sensory) coupling. Significance: A linear cortical drive is lacking in the majority of ET patients.