Slug Flow Characterization in an Alkaline Water Electrolyzer for Hydrogen Production

Abstract

A water electrolyzer is an electrochemical device that produces hydrogen and oxygen from water via electricity. A sustainable way of producing hydrogen with renewable electricity, also known as green hydrogen, could enable its use in decarbonisation of sectors that depend on fossil fuels. However, to scale up the production of green hydrogen, larger water electrolyzers are required, which presents challenges. Water electrolyzers produce hydrogen in the form of bubbles, which are transported away through outlet channels. The geometry of the outlet channel is important for performance and safety. A channel that is too wide can result in unwanted ionic current leakage, reducing efficiency and increasing the risk of explosion. To reduce the leakage current, the electrical resistance in the channel can be increased to make it difficult for ions to flow through. However, a narrow channel can increase the hydraulic resistance, leading to clogging due to bubble build-up. This study focuses on the characterization of the slug flow regimes that eventually lead to clogging of the outlet channel in a novel electrolyzer design. To characterize the flow when blockage develops, electrochemical tests with industrially relevant 6M KOH were carried out at room temperature and ambient pressure in conjunction with high-speed video recording. The examined channel was 2 mm high, 3 mm wide, and 40 mm long. The experiments showed that clogging occurs for certain flow regimes. The hydraulic configuration caused clogging at the hydrogen side, which caused the liquid flow prefer to travel via the anode rather than the cathode, which was reflected in the temperature plots. Clogging did not occur when the superficial gas velocity was greater than 0.3 cm/s, which corresponds to a current density of 140 mA/cm2. The clogging was also not visible at a superficial liquid velocity greater than 0.25 cm/s. Below these values, clogging is expected to take place for the investigated channel dimensions. The bubble diameters in the bubble layer in front of the channel were measured with a microscopic camera. The mean bubble diameter was 0.4 mm, which is 80% smaller than the height of the channel through which they flow. However, exceptional bubble sizes that were 3 to 4 times the channel height, which ultimately led to clogging of the channel, were also present. The bubble layer thickness and velocity at increasing liquid flow rates and current densities were measured using a high-speed camera. At low current densities, the velocity and thickness of the bubble layer were not affected by the liquid flow rate. At higher current densities, a higher liquid flow rate appeared to reduce the thickness of the bubble layer, but not the velocity of the bubble layer. The bubble layer thickness as well as the velocity strongly depend on the applied current density (and thus the gas flow velocity). This knowledge might be, when the flow regimes are scaled to larger electrolyzer dimensions accordingly, essential for future electrolyzer manufacturers and operators for the operation and design of larger-scale electrolyzers. It will give insight into which flow regimes should be avoided in order to avoid clogging and thus explosion risks during operation.