Gas bubble removal from a zero-gap alkaline electrolyser with a pressure swing and why foam electrodes might not be suitable at high current densities

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

J.J. Bleeker (TU Delft - ChemE/Transport Phenomena)

Celine van Kasteren (Student TU Delft)

JR van Ommen (TU Delft - ChemE/Product and Process Engineering)

David A. Vermaas (TU Delft - ChemE/Transport Phenomena)

Research Group
ChemE/Transport Phenomena
Copyright
© 2024 J.J. Bleeker, Celine van Kasteren, J.R. van Ommen, D.A. Vermaas
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.147
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Copyright
© 2024 J.J. Bleeker, Celine van Kasteren, J.R. van Ommen, D.A. Vermaas
Research Group
ChemE/Transport Phenomena
Volume number
57
Pages (from-to)
1398-1407
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

To make green hydrogen more economically attractive, the energy losses in alkaline electrolysis need to be minimized while operating at high current densities (1 A cm−2). At these current densities the ohmic resistance and gas bubbles effects contribute largely to the energy losses. To mitigate the gas bubbles losses, we demonstrate, for the first time, a pressure swing to remove gas bubbles in a zero-gap alkaline water electrolyzer. The pressure swing leverages the ideal gas law to increase the volume of gas in the system periodically, for a short duration (<2 s). This temporal volume increase effectively removes bubbles from the electrolyzer. We show that pressure swing can be used to measure the effect of bubbles on the ohmic resistance (RBubbles). Our results reveal that foam electrodes have a significantly larger RBubbles than perforated plate electrodes (1.8 Ω cm2 vs 0.3 Ω cm2). The time-averaged cell voltage reduces by 170 mV when applying pressure swings to an electrolyzer operating at 200 mA cm−2 in 1 M KOH with foam electrodes. The bubble resistance further depends on the electrolyte conductivity (inversely proportional) and is only moderately affected by operating pressure (25 % lower when increasing pressure amplitude from 1–2 to 1–5 bar). By implementing these findings in a model, we estimate that the pressure swing could reduce the cell voltage by ∼0.1 V for an electrolyzer operating at industrial conditions (6 M KOH, 80 °C, 1 A cm−2) for foam electrodes. For perforated plate electrodes, however, the reduced cell voltage is lower and does not outweigh the additional compression energy.