Project Delivery Methods to Digital Fabrication in Architecture

A comparative case study from a modularity perspective

Book Chapter (2024)
Author(s)

Tan Tan (The University of Hong Kong, TU Delft - Design & Construction Management)

Daniel Hall (TU Delft - Design & Construction Management)

E Papadonikolaki (TU Delft - Integral Design & Management)

Grant Mills (University College London)

Konrad Graser (Zurich University of Applied Science (ZHAW))

Research Group
Design & Construction Management
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003383840-5
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Design & Construction Management
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Pages (from-to)
46-63
ISBN (print)
['978-1-032-46208-0', '978-1-032-46929-4']
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-003-38384-0
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Digital Fabrication (DFAB) faces challenges in project delivery due to various barriers, such as its complex technical processes and unclear benefits. However, there is no specific research on project delivery methods for DFAB. This study conducts a comparative case study to understand the delivery of projects with varying degrees of DFAB implementation. Modularity theory is used as a lens to explore project delivery methods. This study tentatively proposes strategies for establishing potential project delivery methods for DFAB. The research identifies three key characteristics: 1) the adoption of modular products and processes, 2) the adoption of an integral type of project delivery method, and 3) the significant role of informal relationships in project delivery. The study finds that misalignment relationships at the product, process, and supply chain levels, namely the combination of modular products and processes with integral supply chains, have fostered flexibility and coordination in DFAB project delivery. Theoretically, this study discusses the symbiosis and interrelationship between modularity and integration within the context of project delivery. Practitioners can build on these strategies to establish project delivery methods.

Files

Chapter_4_Clean13.pdf
(pdf | 2.04 Mb)
License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 20-09-2025