Control of a Drag Power Kite over the Entire Wind Speed Range

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Florian Bauer (Technische Universität München)

Daniel Petzold (Technische Universität München)

Ralph M. Kennel (Technische Universität München)

Filippo Campagnolo (Technische Universität München)

Roland Schmehl (TU Delft - Wind Energy)

Research Group
Wind Energy
Copyright
© 2019 Florian Bauer, Daniel Petzold, Ralph M. Kennel, Filippo Campagnolo, R. Schmehl
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G004207
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 Florian Bauer, Daniel Petzold, Ralph M. Kennel, Filippo Campagnolo, R. Schmehl
Research Group
Wind Energy
Issue number
10
Volume number
42
Pages (from-to)
2167-2182
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

A control scheme for drag power kites, also known as airborne wind turbines, for the entire wind speed range is proposed, including 1) a temperature controller allowing for temporary overloading of the powertrain; 2) a limitation controller ensuring that power, force, speed, and actuator constraints are satisfied; 3) a tangential flight speed controller; and 4) a tangential force control allocation, which inverts the nonline arities of the plant and allocates the flight speed controller’s tangential force demand to the available actuators. The drag power kite plant model is based on a point-mass model and a simple aerodynamics model with various drag contributions. Simulations are conducted with the parameters of the 20 kW Wing 7 developed by Makani Power, Inc. The proper working of the control scheme is indicated by the good match of the simulation results with independent simulation results and measurements published by Makani. A temporary overloading of the power train with about twice the nominal power can be concluded as a requirement; otherwise the mean power would be significantly lower. Because of the reduction of the lift and thus reduction of the centripetal force at high wind speeds, the inside-down figure eight can be concluded as the best pattern.

Files

1.g004207.pdf
(pdf | 1.3 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-02-2020
License info not available