To warrant clinical adoption AI models require a multi-faceted implementation evaluation
Davy van de Sande (Erasmus MC)
Eline Fung Fen Chung (Erasmus MC)
Jacobien H.F. Oosterhoff (TU Delft - Information and Communication Technology)
Jasper van Van Bommel (Erasmus MC)
D.A.M.P.J. Gommers (Erasmus MC)
Michel E. van Genderen (Erasmus MC)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Despite artificial intelligence (AI) technology progresses at unprecedented rate, our ability to translate these advancements into clinical value and adoption at the bedside remains comparatively limited. This paper reviews the current use of implementation outcomes in randomized controlled trials evaluating AI-based clinical decision support and found limited adoption. To advance trust and clinical adoption of AI, there is a need to bridge the gap between traditional quantitative metrics and implementation outcomes to better grasp the reasons behind the success or failure of AI systems and improve their translation into clinical value.
help_outline