Material fingerprinting as a tool to investigate between and within material type variability with a focus on material hardness
J.R. van Duijvenbode (TU Delft - Resource Engineering)
Louis M. Cloete (AngloGold Ashanti South Africa, Johannesburg)
Masoud Soleymani Shishvan (TU Delft - Resource Engineering)
Mike W.N. Buxton (TU Delft - Resource Engineering)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Geochemical and mineralogical datasets from Tropicana Gold Mine, Australia, have been used to define Au-mineralised fingerprints. VNIR-SWIR spectral data were represented by four normalised wavelength regions and were clustered to form spectral classes. Sequentially, these spectral class proportions within a block and co-located pXRF data were clustered to discriminate material types (fingerprints). The hardness of each type was further explored using collocated BWi, Axb, Equotip rebound hardness and penetration rate datasets, but also by considering spatial contextual relationships and the within material type variability. The Tropicana orebody example gave a good illustration of how a phengitic-epidote K-feldspar rich domain (schistosity and softer, ∼15–18 kWh/t) separated from a harder (>20 kWh/t), shorter wavelength phengitic plagioclase-rich feldspar dominated domain. Exploring the within material type differences using the white mica composition (wAlOH) and a new w605 spectral feature demonstrated how the effects of shearing were captured within material types. Such findings will ultimately improve the understanding of the constitutive material hardness and have significance for process optimisation and blending strategy design.
help_outline