Are you familiar with our concept?

Understanding how Bouwstromen shape collaboration and conceptual housing delivery in the Netherlands

Master Thesis (2025)
Author(s)

L.N. de Gier (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Contributor(s)

Daniel Hall – Mentor (TU Delft - Design & Construction Management)

MG Elsinga – Mentor (TU Delft - Urban Development Management)

A. Petrović – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Urban Studies)

Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Graduation Date
24-06-2025
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences']
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The Netherlands is facing a significant housing shortage, with a target of 900.000 new homes by 2030. Bouwstromen have emerged as a promising response to accelerate delivery and improve affordability. However, the organizational and collaborative dynamics within Bouwstromen are not well understood. This thesis examines three active Bouwstromen: WoonST 2.0, NH Bouwstroom and Bouwstroom Haaglanden. Through a comparative case study based on interviews with key actors and project documentation, the research explores how Bouwstromen reshape actor roles, collaboration and governance in urban development. In-depth interviews and qualitative coding are applied to analyze these shifts among involved parties. Findings show that Bouwstromen transform traditional roles: housing associations evolve into coordinators of mutli-year projects within a portfolio; municipalities shift to strategic collaborators and builders step into a reactive product developers role. Early alignment and trust foster ‘no-relearning’ efficiencies and facilitate standardization at scale. Yet, challenges remain in aligning municipal processes, clarifying responsibilities and balancing standardization with site-specific flexibility. This study contributes to the understanding of programmatic housing delivery by linking governance structures to collaboration and IC method adoption. The insights provide a basis for improving permit procedures, strengthening partnerships and supporting scalable housing solutions within the Dutch urban context.

Files

License info not available
P5-Presentation.pdf
(pdf | 20.7 Mb)
License info not available
License info not available