Prognostic Value of Electroencephalography in Critically Ill Adult Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

A Systematic Review

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Marit Verboom (Erasmus MC)

Robert van den Berg (Erasmus MC)

Mark van de Ruit (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Mathieu van der Jagt (Erasmus MC)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151251381351
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/publishing/publisher-deals Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Prognostication after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains challenging in the intensive care unit (ICU) despite the existence of well-validated online prognostication tools. Changes in brain activity related to TBI can be measured using electroencephalography (EEG), making it a potentially interesting diagnostic tool to refine prognostication. The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature concerning the prognostic value of EEG among patients with TBI in the ICU. Five databases were searched from inception until August 13, 2024. The search identified 1492 unique records. Eventually, 27 manuscripts met the inclusion criteria (>18 years old, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12, EEG performed in the ICU). The QUIPS (QUality In Prognostic Studies) and PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool) tools were used to assess the study quality and bias. Due to high heterogeneity in EEG feature and outcome definitions and a lack of correction for confounding factors, all studies had a moderate-to-high risk of bias. Nonetheless, specific EEG features (identified through visual and quantitative EEG, EEG reactivity, and machine learning techniques) were found to be predictive of neurological outcomes up to 1.5 years after TBI. While epileptiform discharges and seizures were not consistently associated with outcomes, a higher alpha variability, a more continuous EEG, present EEG reactivity, and present EEG sleep features were predictive of better outcomes. The combination of EEG features with clinical parameters demonstrated improved predictive performance compared with models using standard clinical parameters alone. Still, the EEG features described and their potential additional value in outcome prediction after TBI merit further investigation.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 06-04-2026